Survivorship bias refers to the logical error of concentrating on the people or things that "survived" some process while inadvertently overlooking those that did not because of their lack of visibility. This bias can lead to false conclusions, as the results or remaining subjects are not representative of the initial group or conditions.
In finance and business, survivorship bias can result in an overly optimistic perception of performance. Historical data, such as mutual fund returns, can be skewed if only the funds that have survived the test of time are considered. This presents an incomplete image, as the performance of funds that have been dissolved or merged is not taken into account. Similarly, businesses may study successful companies without recognizing the lessons that can be learned from those that failed, potentially leading to misguided strategies.
Survivorship bias is a logical error that occurs when a portion of data is overlooked, leading to misleading conclusions. This bias often manifests in case studies where failed examples are ignored, while successful examples are overly highlighted. During World War II, this concept played a crucial role in military strategies, particularly in aircraft defense systems.
During World War II, the American military was faced with the challenge of protecting their airplanes from enemy fire. Initially, the focus was on reinforcing the areas that showed the most bullet holes on returning planes. It was assumed that these were the areas most susceptible to damage. However, this approach did not account for the planes that did not make it back, which could offer additional, valuable insights.
Abraham Wald, a mathematician, challenged the prevailing wisdom on aircraft vulnerability. Wald observed the bullet holes on the airplanes that returned and made a crucial counter-intuitive insight. Instead of adding armour to the areas with the most bullet holes, he proposed reinforcing the areas with the fewest bullet holes. His rationale was that the planes were returning despite being hit in these more robust areas, suggesting that the planes that were shot down were likely to have taken damage in the parts that were hole-free on the returning planes, such as the engines or fuel systems. This shift in perspective was a fundamental application of survivorship bias, revealing that what is seen (the survivable damage) can mislead from what is unseen (the critical, but less obvious, vulnerabilities).
Survivorship bias is a distortion in the understanding of success and performance within finance and business, often resulting in misleading outcomes by focusing only on the winners while ignoring those that did not endure.
It is common in the financial industry to evaluate mutual funds based on their returns. However, this approach can be misleading due to survivorship bias. Funds that perform poorly and are subsequently dissolved or merged are excluded from datasets, inflating the average performance of surviving funds. Studies, such as those on the impact of survivorship bias in mutual funds, show that this can cause investors to overestimate future returns. Recognition of this sampling bias is critical for accurate interpretation of mutual fund performance.
The finance community has endeavored to correct mutual fund performance assessments by incorporating data from non-surviving funds. Survivor bias has the potential to lead to an overestimation of historical performance when considering only the funds that have survived. For instance, a review of measures of persistence in fund performance demonstrated that overlooking the impact of non-surviving funds indeed distorts perceived returns.
In the business world, entrepreneurial success stories like those of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg can sometimes overshadow the vast number of ventures that fail. Survivorship bias leads to a disproportionate amount of attention on the billionaires who succeeded while ignoring the many that didn't, thus creating an unrealistic expectation of becoming an exceptional success in the entrepreneurial field.
Moreover, when considering these successful outcomes, survivorship bias suggests that one might overestimate the ease of achieving billionaire status. It obscures the myriad of factors leading to success and the inherent challenges in entrepreneurship. Highlighting stories of survivors without considering the full spectrum of experiences can lead to a skewed understanding of what constitutes typical business success.
In the context of financial markets, survivorship bias can lead to incorrect interpretations of stock market data and indices. The S&P 500, for example, is an index that is frequently understood as a solid barometer for U.S. equity performance, but it inherently carries survivor bias since only currently successful companies are represented. This could potentially give an investor an overly optimistic view of market conditions.
When only successful stocks and survivors in the market are considered, one might wrongly assume that investing in the stock market is less risky or more predictable than it actually is. Thus, understanding survivorship bias is crucial for anyone interpreting stock market performance. It emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the tail of the distribution—those stocks that didn't fare well and are often excluded from analysis.
.png)
.png)
.png)
