The Growth-Share Matrix, also known as the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix, is a strategic planning tool that was developed by the Boston Consulting Group in the early 1970s. This matrix allows companies to analyze their business units or product lines, helping them decide where to invest, discontinue or develop each unit or product line.
We've interviewed dozens of senior Strategy & Operations leaders to hear how they've built and scaled the function at their high-performing organizations.
Be the first to get the report ->
The matrix is divided into four quadrants, each representing a type of product or business unit: Stars, Cash Cows, Dogs, and Question Marks. These categories are based on two dimensions: market growth rate and relative market share. The Growth-Share Matrix is a simple yet powerful tool for large diversified companies to map and manage their business units or product portfolios.
The Growth-Share Matrix is a 2x2 grid with market growth rate indicating the annual growth of the market that the business unit or product operates in on the y-axis, and relative market share, which compares the business unit or product's market share to that of its largest competitor, on the x-axis.
The four quadrants of the matrix represent different types of business units or products, each with a unique set of characteristics, growth prospects, and challenges. Understanding these quadrants is key to using the Growth-Share Matrix effectively.
Stars are business units or products that operate in high-growth industries and have a high relative market share. Stars are often the leaders in the business but also need a lot of investment to sustain their growth. When the market's growth rate slows, Stars have the potential to become Cash Cows if they have maintained their leadership position.
Companies need to invest heavily in Stars to maintain their market position. This investment often comes at the expense of maximizing short-term profit, but it's necessary for long-term success.
Cash Cows are the leaders in mature markets. These business units or products have a high relative market share, but they operate in low-growth industries. Cash Cows require less investment because the market's growth rate has slowed, and they generate more cash than what's needed to maintain their market share.
Companies should milk these Cash Cows for cash to reinvest in Stars and Question Marks. Cash Cows provide the cash required to turn Question Marks into market leaders, cover the administrative costs of the company, fund research and development, service the corporate debt, and pay dividends to shareholders.
The remaining two quadrants of the Growth-Share Matrix, Dogs and Question Marks, represent business units or products that require careful consideration regarding whether they are worth the investment.
These quadrants often require difficult decisions to be made, as they may not be as profitable as Stars or Cash Cows, but they may still hold potential for the company.
Dogs are business units or products that have a low relative market share and operate in slow-growth industries. They do not generate much cash, nor do they require a large amount of cash. However, Dogs often have enough cash to sustain themselves.
Companies should minimize the number of Dogs in their portfolio. While it may be tempting to keep them for sentimental reasons or because of personal beliefs, they often do not provide a viable return on investment. In many cases, it's better to liquidate, divest, or reposition these business units or products.
Question Marks are business units or products that operate in high-growth markets but have a low relative market share. These are the potential Stars of the future, and the company's challenge is to pick the winners and nurture them into Stars.
Companies should invest in Question Marks if the product has potential for growth and can become a market leader. If not, they should be phased out before they become Dogs. The decision to invest in a Question Mark is not easy and requires strategic thinking and careful analysis.
The Growth-Share Matrix can be used as a portfolio management tool. Companies can use it to manage their different business units and product lines effectively, making strategic decisions about where to invest, where to divest, and where to focus their resources.
By categorizing their business units or products into Stars, Cash Cows, Dogs, and Question Marks, companies can assess the current state of their portfolio and determine future strategies. The matrix can also be used to analyze competitors and make strategic decisions about market positioning.
Portfolio analysis is a major benefit of the Growth-Share Matrix. By plotting their business units or products on the matrix, companies can get a visual representation of their portfolio's current state. This can help them understand how their products are performing and where they are in the product life cycle.
Portfolio analysis can also help companies identify gaps in their portfolio, opportunities for growth, and areas where they may need to divest or reposition. This can inform their strategic planning and help them make better investment decisions.
Another use of the Growth-Share Matrix is for competitive analysis. By plotting their competitors' products on the matrix, companies can identify which areas they are leading in and where they are lagging behind.
This can help them identify opportunities for growth and development, as well as threats that need to be addressed. Competitive analysis can also inform a company's market positioning strategy, helping them decide where to compete and how to differentiate themselves.
While the Growth-Share Matrix is a powerful tool, it's not without its limitations. One of the main criticisms of the matrix is that it focuses only on market growth rate and relative market share, ignoring other important factors such as market profitability, competitive position, or market trends.
Another limitation is that it assumes market attractiveness and business unit strength are the only two factors determining the success of a business unit or product. This may not always be the case, as other factors such as brand strength, technological capabilities, and quality of management can also play a significant role.
The Growth-Share Matrix can lead to an overemphasis on market share. While market share is important, it's not the only factor that determines success. Companies can have a low market share but still be highly profitable if they have a strong brand, high-quality products, or a loyal customer base.
Furthermore, pursuing market share can sometimes lead to destructive price wars or other competitive behaviors that can harm the company's profitability or brand image. Therefore, while market share is a useful metric, it should not be the only factor considered when making strategic decisions.
The Growth-Share Matrix also ignores market profitability. A business unit or product can be a Star or Cash Cow, but if the market it operates in is not profitable, it will not contribute to the company's bottom line.
Therefore, companies should also consider market profitability when using the Growth-Share Matrix. This can be done by adjusting the size of the circles used to represent the business units or products on the matrix to reflect their profitability.
The Growth-Share Matrix is a valuable tool for strategic planning. It can help companies manage their portfolio of business units or products, make strategic investment decisions, and analyze their competitive position. However, like any tool, it's not perfect and should not be used in isolation.
Companies should consider other factors such as market profitability, competitive position, and brand strength when using the Growth-Share Matrix. They should also use the matrix as part of a broader strategic planning process, incorporating other tools and frameworks to get a comprehensive view of their strategic position.
.png)
.png)
.png)
