Dashboard mockup

Good Strategy vs. Bad Strategy: Rumelt's Framework Explained

"Good Strategy, Bad Strategy" by Richard Rumelt: Key takeaways for effective strategic planning.

Blog Post
February 5, 2024

In his influential book "Good Strategy, Bad Strategy", Richard Rumelt, a renowned expert in the field of strategy, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding what makes a strategy effective. Drawing on his extensive experience as a consultant, researcher, and professor, Rumelt offers valuable insights into the core elements of good strategy and the common pitfalls that lead to bad strategy.

The book's importance lies in its ability to demystify the concept of strategy and provide practical guidance for both business leaders and strategists. By clearly distinguishing between good and bad strategy, Rumelt equips readers with the tools necessary to critically evaluate and improve their own strategic thinking and planning processes.

Part 1: Understanding the Difference Between Good and Bad Strategy

According to Rumelt, good strategy is characterized by a coherent set of actions that address a specific challenge or opportunity. As MAA1 explains in their review of the book, good strategy "is not just about setting goals or having a vision; it's about creating a clear and coherent plan to achieve those goals in the face of challenges and constraints."

Rumelt identifies three essential elements of good strategy:

  1. Diagnosis: A clear understanding of the challenge or opportunity at hand, based on a thorough analysis of the situation.
  2. Guiding policy: An overall approach or set of principles that guide decision-making and action.
  3. Coherent action: A set of coordinated, mutually reinforcing actions that align with the guiding policy and address the diagnosed challenge.

These three components form what Rumelt calls the "kernel" of good strategy, as explained in the review on Kellblog. When these elements are present and well-integrated, they create a powerful framework for effective strategic planning and execution.

In contrast, bad strategy is characterized by a lack of coherence, a failure to address critical challenges, and a tendency to mistake goals or aspirations for actual strategy. As discussed in the review on The Right Questions, common pitfalls of bad strategy include:

  • Fluff: Vague, buzzword-filled statements that lack substance or coherence.
  • Failure to face the challenge: Avoiding the difficult choices and trade-offs necessary for effective strategy.
  • Mistaking goals for strategy: Confusing aspirations or desired outcomes with a coherent plan of action.
  • Template-style planning: Relying on generic, one-size-fits-all approaches rather than context-specific thinking.

By understanding the difference between good and bad strategy, leaders can avoid these pitfalls and develop more effective plans for their organizations.

Part 2: Key Concepts and Frameworks from the Book

In addition to the core elements of good strategy, Rumelt introduces several key concepts and frameworks that can help strategists navigate the complexities of strategic planning.

One such concept is the idea of proximate objectives, which are concrete, achievable goals that serve as stepping stones toward the overall strategic objective. As explained in the review on LinkedIn, proximate objectives "are at the heart of strategy because they define a specific target that can be achieved in a reasonable period with the resources available." By setting and pursuing proximate objectives, organizations can make tangible progress toward their larger strategic goals.

Another important framework introduced in the book is the concept of chain-link systems, which Deepak Hoysal discusses in his review on LinkedIn. Chain-link systems are complex, interconnected systems in which the performance of the whole depends on the strength of each individual link. In the context of strategy, this means that a weakness in any one area can undermine the effectiveness of the entire plan. Understanding chain-link systems can help strategists identify and address critical vulnerabilities in their organizations.

Eric Nehrlich's blog post provides a concise summary of the kernel of strategy and its role in guiding effective strategic planning. By focusing on diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent action, strategists can cut through the noise and develop plans that directly address the challenges and opportunities facing their organizations.

Part 3: Applying the Principles of Good Strategy

To put the principles of good strategy into practice, strategists must start by diagnosing the critical challenges and opportunities facing their organizations. As Roger Martin, a prominent strategic thinker, emphasizes in his work, this diagnostic process involves identifying the key issues that the strategy must address and understanding the underlying factors that contribute to these challenges.

Once the diagnosis is complete, the next step is to develop a guiding policy that directly addresses the identified challenges. As Geoffrey Moore, author of "Crossing the Chasm," argues in his work on innovation strategy, this may involve striking a balance between investments in sustaining and disruptive innovation, depending on the organization's specific context and goals.

With a clear guiding policy in place, strategists can then create a set of coherent actions that align with this policy and support the overall strategy. As Rumelt emphasizes throughout the book, focus and resource allocation are critical at this stage. Organizations must be willing to make tough choices and prioritize the actions that will have the greatest impact on achieving their strategic objectives.

Real-world examples of companies applying good strategy principles can be found across various industries. For instance, Apple's turnaround under Steve Jobs in the late 1990s and early 2000s is often cited as a prime example of effective strategic thinking. By focusing on a core set of products and streamlining the company's operations, Jobs was able to guide Apple from the brink of bankruptcy to unprecedented success.

Part 4: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Bad Strategy

Just as important as understanding the principles of good strategy is recognizing and avoiding the pitfalls of bad strategy. As Rumelt illustrates throughout the book, bad strategy is often characterized by fluff, buzzwords, and a lack of coherence. Strategists must be vigilant in identifying these signs and steering clear of strategies that lack substance or fail to address the critical challenges facing their organizations.

Another common pitfall is mistaking goals for strategy. As Rumelt emphasizes, simply setting ambitious targets or aspirations is not enough; organizations must develop a clear and coherent plan for achieving these goals. This requires making tough choices, prioritizing resources, and being willing to say no to initiatives that do not align with the overall strategy.

Finally, strategists must be wary of the dangers of template-style strategic planning. While frameworks and best practices can be useful starting points, effective strategy requires context-specific thinking and adaptability. Organizations must be willing to continuously learn, adjust their plans based on new information, and remain agile in the face of changing circumstances.

Conclusion

"Good Strategy, Bad Strategy" offers a compelling framework for understanding and developing effective strategic thinking and planning. By distinguishing between good and bad strategy, Rumelt provides a clear roadmap for organizations seeking to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape.

Key takeaways from the book include the importance of diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent action in crafting good strategy, as well as the need to avoid common pitfalls such as fluff, mistaking goals for strategy, and relying on generic templates. By applying these principles and continuously refining their strategic thinking, organizations can position themselves for long-term success.

Ultimately, the book serves as a call to action for strategists and business leaders to critically examine their own strategic planning processes and strive for greater clarity, coherence, and effectiveness in their decision-making. By embracing the principles of good strategy and avoiding the traps of bad strategy, organizations can unlock their full potential and thrive in an increasingly competitive world.

Related Reading

What's your dream strategy view?