CompareStrategic portfolio management

Dotwork vs Planisware

A portfolio and project planning vendor whose products cover complex enterprise portfolios, packaged PPM and IT strategic portfolio management.

Planisware plans and controls complex portfolios, from stage-gates and schedules to earned value and simulation. Dotwork connects the portfolio to an explicit cost and labor basis, with technology cost and architecture on the same model.

At a glance

Strategic portfolio management

Planisware

vs

Operating model

Dotwork

Usually runs alongside Dotwork

Dotwork connects to it and puts its data in the context of the whole enterprise.

The short version

What each is built for.

Planisware

Planisware is a publicly listed portfolio and project planning vendor. Planisware Enterprise serves complex portfolios with scheduling, earned value and project finance; Orchestra is packaged PPM for PMOs; and Horizon is IT strategic portfolio management, covering strategy and OKRs, roadmaps, financial scenarios and application rationalization.

  • Project controls: WBS, Gantt, PERT, earned value and stage-gate
  • Investment scenarios and resource what-if across scarce capacity
  • Schedule-risk analysis with Monte Carlo simulation
  • Portfolio management for R&D, engineering and product development

Dotwork

Dotwork is an AI-native enterprise operating platform built on the Enterprise Operating Model: one live, graph-based model that connects strategy, capital, work, technology and AI across the enterprise. Next to Planisware, Dotwork connects the portfolio to an explicit cost and labor basis, technology cost and architecture.

  • Tracing strategy and funded work to allocated capability cost, with uncovered amounts shown
  • Splitting labor variance by driver across plan, time written and ledger
  • Holding IT financial structure, architecture and AI on one model with the portfolio
  • Planning AI agent budgets against metered token cost

The core difference

How Dotwork and Planisware approach the problem.

Planisware is an operating project-control and portfolio system that connects strategy to delivery. Dotwork connects the portfolio to an explicit cost and labor basis, with technology cost and architecture on the same model.

Context

Planisware holds context in portfolios, projects, schedules, resources and financials, and links strategy to execution across its products. Dotwork holds it in a graph with explicit rules for how cost and labor measures are allocated and compared.

Decisions

Planisware supports decisions about which work to choose and sequence within capacity, using scenarios and simulation. Dotwork supports decisions that need the agreed cost and labor basis behind the portfolio, connected to technology cost and architecture.

Time

Planisware manages time through schedules, baselines and probabilistic completion dates. Dotwork keeps plans, decisions and record history across planning cycles, with labor variance shown by period.

Change

Planisware governs change through stage-gates and configurable portfolio processes. Dotwork runs ordered approval phases and starts from a reference Enterprise Operating Model shaped to the customer.

Architecture and data model

Side by side.

Planisware is built to plan and control complex portfolios, from stage-gates through schedules and earned value, and it documents links from strategy to execution. Dotwork's difference is the explicit cost and measure rules in its model. Funded work is traced toward allocated capability cost, and the model shows how much of the portfolio that cost covers and what remains unallocated. Those allocations come from the model's allocation runs and are shown in Dotwork.

Architecture and data model comparison between Dotwork and Planisware
DimensionPlaniswareDotwork
Core modelPortfolio, project and resource planning platformGraph-based Enterprise Operating Model
Project controlsWBS, Gantt, PERT, earned value and baseline change controlHierarchy, milestones, resource assignment and plan against actual
GovernanceStage-gate approval tied to portfolio processesOrdered approval phases with named deciders and an audit trail
Scenarios and riskInvestment scenarios, resource what-if and schedule-risk Monte CarloPlanning scenarios on operating-model records; no Monte Carlo simulation
Cost basisProject finance, budgets, forecasts and actualsStrategy traced to allocated capability cost, with coverage and unallocated amounts shown
Model scopeStrategy, portfolio and delivery, with application rationalization in HorizonTechnology cost, architecture and AI governance alongside the portfolio

The role of AI

Where the AI gets its context.

Both use agents and MCP to open their data to AI. Planisware's AI works across portfolio and project execution; Dotwork's works across a model that also holds technology cost, architecture and AI governance.

Planisware

Planisware presents a common AI platform across its products. In 2026 it introduced Prisma, described as a governed reasoning agent that can make controlled updates, named Oscar as the assistant in Orchestra, and advertises MCP access in its integration catalog.

Dotwork

Dotwork's assistant answers questions across the whole model, so one question can move from a portfolio decision to the cost and architecture behind it. Chat agents create and update Dotwork records with optional human review, and an MCP server exposes the model to outside AI tools.

A fair comparison

Where Planisware is strong — and where Dotwork is different.

Where Planisware is strong

  • Deep project controls: WBS, Gantt, PERT, earned value and stage-gate approval
  • Investment scenarios, resource what-if and schedule-risk Monte Carlo simulation
  • A strong fit for R&D, engineering and product development portfolios
  • A broad integration catalog, including REST APIs, SAP, Oracle, Workday, Jira and Azure DevOps
  • Products for different levels of maturity, from packaged PMO adoption in Orchestra to complex portfolios in Enterprise, backed by an expanded partner network

Where Dotwork is different

  • Traces strategy to allocated capability cost and shows how much of the portfolio that cost covers and what remains unallocated
  • Splits labor variance by driver: plan against time written, and time written against the ledger
  • Provides native IT financial structure, including AI agent budgets set against metered token cost
  • Holds technology cost, enterprise architecture and AI governance in the same model as the portfolio

Choosing

Which fits your situation.

Choose Planisware when

  • You need scheduling, earned value and stage-gate control
  • You need schedule-risk simulation and resource what-if
  • You run R&D, engineering or product development portfolios
  • Your PMO wants a packaged PPM product with an established delivery path

Planisware fits organizations that need an operating project-control system for scheduling, earned value, stage-gates and scenario analysis, especially across R&D and engineering portfolios.

Choose Dotwork when

  • Portfolio decisions are blocked on agreeing what the work costs in capability and labor terms
  • You need labor variance explained by driver, not as one number
  • IT investment needs to connect to technology cost, architecture and AI spend
  • You want the portfolio held on the same model as finance and architecture

Dotwork fits organizations where the blocked portfolio decision needs an agreed cost and labor basis, connected to technology cost and architecture.

The bottom line

Choose Dotwork when you want to connect the enterprise across systems and silos — with a lower total cost of ownership.

One operating model across strategy, capital, work, technology and AI, instead of another tool to integrate, reconcile and maintain alongside Planisware.

See it on your data

FAQ

Questions buyers ask.

Does Dotwork have stage gates?+

Dotwork runs ordered approval phases with named deciders and an audit trail. These phases are not yet tied to funding tranches or enforced on the server, so organizations that need full stage-gate control rely on a tool like Planisware.

Can Dotwork run schedule risk simulations?+

No. Dotwork does not run Monte Carlo simulation. Planisware offers schedule-risk analysis with Monte Carlo.

Can Dotwork and Planisware be used together?+

Yes, and that is the usual setup. Planisware remains the system for planning and controlling projects, and Dotwork connects that portfolio to allocated cost, labor and architecture. The integration is scoped for each customer.

Be Decisive.Build Fast.Connect Everything.

Start Connecting